Case studies / Yes Bank / 2026
My email on two other customers' records
Bank · Savings account · wrong-email account
- Complaint no.
- N202627016015307
- Against
- Yes Bank
- Filed
- 14 Aug 2026
- Closed
- 16 Sep 2026
- Time taken
- 33 days
- Scheme
- RB-IOS 2026
- Closure clause
- 14(8)(e)
- Did it help?
- Partly helped
- Compensation
- None
What happened
I was receiving banking communications meant for two unrelated people. My email address was on their records.
What I asked the Ombudsman for
Remove my email from both records, confirm what had been sent to me, and compensate for time and harassment.
What the entity said
The bank said those customers had supplied the address themselves at onboarding and it had recorded what it was given. It removed the address from one record; the other account had never been opened. It said nothing of mine had been disclosed and no financial loss had been shown.
My reply to the entity's response
A three-page reply with exhibits, plus a supplementary note when the bank, after the complaint, emailed me the other customer's unmasked customer number.
Did the closure deal with it? In part.
What the Ombudsman decided
Corrective action taken. Since there was no financial loss, the request for compensation was not accepted. Closed in 33 days.
Did the Ombudsman help?
Partly. The email was removed. The closure described the bank's defence as though I had complained of my own data being disclosed, which was the reverse of the complaint, and refused compensation for lack of financial loss although I had claimed under the head that does not need one.
What I took from it
Without a quantifiable loss, compensation depends on the bank offering it or on some separate failure in handling. Here there was neither.
Summarised from the RBI closure letter and my own correspondence. Names of individuals, account numbers and reference numbers other than the complaint number have been removed.